You can get a MOA dial made for then if I'm not mistaken. Cant' remember the company off hand.

I've done both- yardage/MOA and prefer MOA for rifles I shoot different loads out of.

My only question with the Leica is does it track reliably? I've looked thru a couple and thought the glass was first rate.

The 3.5-14x42 model with the side focus and elevation turret seems like a good deal for the money....if it consistently tracks.

JM

Mine has tracked very well. There really is not a lot to dislike about the scope. That little phillips head screw that locks the windage dial after zeroing the rifle is the biggest complaint I have with it.

Good to hear. I may have to grab one for my next rifle.

JM

Shall we alert Browning?

Thats the one I was looking for!!!!

Ha! Going to be a Nosler TGR or a Cooper Jackson Hunter in 25-06.
Tain't made up me mind yet.

Here's my review from a few months ago. I have a 2.5-10x42 on a .375 H&H and it's just fine with the recoil.

http://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1421043/m/4211043441?r=4211043441#4211043441

Wow thanks rnovi!!!

I just saw that camera land has one of the TT ERs with the ballistic reticule from a shot show demo. I sent him a PM telling him I would take it if still available. I really like this scope more than any I own other than a 4-16x56 Hensoldt.

I have a 3.5-14 with the #1. I have it on a semi-custom 700 elk rifle in 7stw. I really like the reticle for use in dark timber, to long shots in the clear cuts. Compared to my Swaro Z5 3.5-18 on my ULA, I'd just barely give the nod to the Z5 optically. Both are VERY clear and crisp, the Z5's picture just "jumps" out at me a little more. The only other scope I'd love to compare would be a summit, as the Z6 is just TOO expensive for an elk rifle I "need" 1 week out of the year.