|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,605 Likes: 24
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,605 Likes: 24 |
It’s a good thing that one’s salvation does NOT depend on believing literally in Noah and the Ark. And it’s a good thing that following Jesus does NOT depend on believing literally in Noah and the Ark either. Christ himself said "as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be at the coming of the Son of Man". So Jesus believed in Noah and the Ark He was referring to the story of Noah and the Ark because of the truths contained in it, not because it literally happened. Like me saying to someone about to run a cross country race against a slower opponent, "Remember Aesop's tortoise and the hare." There are valuable truths in the account, despite it never literally having occurred. Yep. Jesus used parables in His teachings, and they are clear examples of allegory and metaphor.
Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 377
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 377 |
Debunked by whom? And on what basis? Meteorology? Meteorology Geology Paleontology Dendrochronology Zoology Anthropology Archeology Mythology Zookeeping Animal Domestication Physics Chemistry Radioactive Decay It is clear that you did not even look at the titles in the playlist. If the only way you can maintain your faith is to dismiss, without consideration, any criticism of your position what does that say about your dedication to the truth? Other branches of science? Like the branch of science that that brought us the Covid vax’s? Or that from the scientists of the branch promoting human-caused climate change? Irrelevant. Nice dodge. Human bias in select presuppositions is in play. You mean the presupposition that "Magic man in the sky done it"? Science relies on a bare minimum of presuppositions. The cosmos exists. We can learn things about the cosmos. Theories that can make testable predictions are more valuable than those that cannot.
One unerring mark of the love of the truth is not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant. John Locke, 1690
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,161 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,161 Likes: 6 |
Don’t strain yourself. Just pretend I didn’t respond..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,280 Likes: 15
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,280 Likes: 15 |
What if what happened is god took DNA from every species on earth, then destroyed the world with a flood, then reintroduced the species he wanted back into the world afterward and the story of Noah is man's interpretation of what happened.
God bless Texas----------------------- Old 300 I will remain what i am until the day I die- A HUNTER......Sitting Bull Its not how you pick the booger.. but where you put it !! Roger V Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 1,433 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 1,433 Likes: 2 |
I’ve thought about that . You would not have to feed an animal on an ark. The ark could be just an object that a human could relate to. Animals could have been also converted to dust once entering the ark and then later brought back.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61,337 Likes: 35
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61,337 Likes: 35 |
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o "May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,654 Likes: 11
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,654 Likes: 11 |
What if what happened is god took DNA from every species on earth, then destroyed the world with a flood, then reintroduced the species he wanted back into the world afterward and the story of Noah is man's interpretation of what happened. Would he have to take it? Or were there species He didn’t create in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,280 Likes: 15
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 47,280 Likes: 15 |
Mo What if what happened is god took DNA from every species on earth, then destroyed the world with a flood, then reintroduced the species he wanted back into the world afterward and the story of Noah is man's interpretation of what happened. Would he have to take it? Or were there species He didn’t create in the first place? Lots of possibilities that early man would not be able to comprehend.
God bless Texas----------------------- Old 300 I will remain what i am until the day I die- A HUNTER......Sitting Bull Its not how you pick the booger.. but where you put it !! Roger V Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 45,524 Likes: 31
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 45,524 Likes: 31 |
Noah was an
ALIEN!
He begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth at about 500 years old. Easy enough for a ALIEN to do.
And the Ark was a
SPACESHIP
easy enough to get above the floodwaters that way.
this stuff ain't hard to figure out folks.
The desert is a true treasure for him who seeks refuge from men and the evil of men. In it is contentment In it is death and all you seek (Quoted from "The Bleeding of the Stone" Ibrahim Al-Koni)
member of the cabal of dysfunctional squirrels?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,231 Likes: 10
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,231 Likes: 10 |
Just remember this. God can do all things and never question the almighty. He is the ultimate judge in the end and we will all stand before him! That's an absolute truth. Amazing to me how many people in this world are lost and spiritually dead or blind. Jesus is the way, the truth, and the light. Believe and repent now! You're presuming he exits, a presumption for which you have not offered sufficient evidence.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,231 Likes: 10
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,231 Likes: 10 |
Noah was an
ALIEN!
He begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth at about 500 years old. Easy enough for a ALIEN to do.
And the Ark was a
SPACESHIP
easy enough to get above the floodwaters that way.
this stuff ain't hard to figure out folks. Was that an episode of Ancient Aliens on The History Channel?
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,654 Likes: 11
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 28,654 Likes: 11 |
Mo What if what happened is god took DNA from every species on earth, then destroyed the world with a flood, then reintroduced the species he wanted back into the world afterward and the story of Noah is man's interpretation of what happened. Would he have to take it? Or were there species He didn’t create in the first place? Lots of possibilities that early man would not be able to comprehend. Yeah. I think loading everything on a boat is just a way for our minds to begin to understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 377
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 377 |
Don’t strain yourself. Just pretend I didn’t respond.. There is no strain involved in disproving the flood myth. Your incredibly weak response was only a palsied criticism of science and did nothing to support your position.
One unerring mark of the love of the truth is not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant. John Locke, 1690
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,640 Likes: 10
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,640 Likes: 10 |
What if what happened is god took DNA from every species on earth, then destroyed the world with a flood, then reintroduced the species he wanted back into the world afterward and the story of Noah is man's interpretation of what happened. interesting thought...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,941 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,941 Likes: 1 |
Noah was an
ALIEN!
He begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth at about 500 years old. Easy enough for a ALIEN to do.
And the Ark was a
SPACESHIP
easy enough to get above the floodwaters that way.
this stuff ain't hard to figure out folks. Nice!! Did you used to have a sock puppet named Gus?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,332 Likes: 18
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,332 Likes: 18 |
Noah was an
ALIEN!
He begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth at about 500 years old. Easy enough for a ALIEN to do.
And the Ark was a
SPACESHIP
easy enough to get above the floodwaters that way.
this stuff ain't hard to figure out folks. Was that an episode of Ancient Aliens on The History Channel? No, and it wasn't Shem, Ham, and Japheth either. It was Shemp, Moe, and Larry and it was an episode of the Three Stooges.
A wise man is frequently humbled.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,954 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,954 Likes: 6 |
Debunked by whom? And on what basis? Meteorology? Meteorology Geology Paleontology Dendrochronology Zoology Anthropology Archeology Mythology Zookeeping Animal Domestication Physics Chemistry Radioactive Decay It is clear that you did not even look at the titles in the playlist. If the only way you can maintain your faith is to dismiss, without consideration, any criticism of your position what does that say about your dedication to the truth? Other branches of science? Like the branch of science that that brought us the Covid vax’s? Or that from the scientists of the branch promoting human-caused climate change? Irrelevant. Nice dodge. Human bias in select presuppositions is in play. You mean the presupposition that "Magic man in the sky done it"? Science relies on a bare minimum of presuppositions. The cosmos exists. We can learn things about the cosmos. Theories that can make testable predictions are more valuable than those that cannot. You mean like the Port Cloud?
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 377
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 377 |
Do you mean the Oort Cloud?
"Scientists think the Oort Cloud is a giant spherical shell surrounding our solar system. It is like a big, thick-walled bubble made of icy pieces of space debris the sizes of mountains and sometimes larger. The Oort Cloud might contain billions, or even trillions, of objects." ..."Though long-period comets observed among the planets are thought to originate in the Oort Cloud, no object has been observed in the distant Oort Cloud itself, leaving it a theoretical concept for the time being. But it remains the most widely-accepted explanation for the origin of long-period comets."- science.nasa.gov/solar-system/oort-cloud/
If you are referring to the Oort Cloud what does a theoretical concept of the origin of long-period comets have to do with the flood myth? If you are referring to something else please explain.
One unerring mark of the love of the truth is not entertaining any proposition with greater assurance than the proofs it is built upon will warrant. John Locke, 1690
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,954 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,954 Likes: 6 |
Auto-correct is a real pain.
"Only Christ is the fullness of God's revelation." Everyday Hunter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61,337 Likes: 35
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61,337 Likes: 35 |
All these religious threads make it too complicated . Believe on The Lord.
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o "May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
476 members (1beaver_shooter, 12344mag, 1badf350, 10gaugemag, 160user, 06hunter59, 40 invisible),
2,701
guests, and
1,208
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,786
Posts18,536,296
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|