|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,441
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,441 |
Is there really any significant gain one over the other between a equal quality 3-9 vs 4-12 scopes on a deer hunting rifle used from close to 300 yards?
Liberalism is a cancer Support Christian Family values
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,399
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,399 |
Good morning, On closer shots the wider FOV of a 3x vs a 4x will come in handier than the extra magnification of 12 vs 9 at 300 yards
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,392
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,392 |
The 3-9 scopes will easily handle anything to 300 yds. We think we need more magnification than we really do.
Always remember that you are unique, just like everyone else.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,960 Likes: 9
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,960 Likes: 9 |
I prefer the 4-12 on most anything I scope.
i can not tell the difference between 3x and 4x in the field, and VERY seldom actually carry the rifle at anything less than maximum power anyway.
12x at the top end vs 9x, on the other hand, allows tighter placement of the crosshairs on targets while at the bench, which gives tighter groups, more accurate zero of the reticle, and inspires greater confidence in the accuracy of the rifle.
People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,383 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,383 Likes: 2 |
If the physical size of the scopes are comparable I prefer the 4-12's For instance a Leupold VX-2 3-9x40 weights 11.2 oz., the Leupold VX-2 4-12x40 weights 11.6 oz. I prefer the 4-12 for the reasons stated by Idaho Shooter. Although I usually keep mine on 6X for all around use but if shooting targets I use 12X.r
drover
223 Rem, my favorite cartridge - you can't argue with truckloads of dead PD's and gophers.
24hourcampfire.com - The site where there is a problem for every solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,306 Likes: 2 |
Good morning, On closer shots the wider FOV of a 3x vs a 4x will come in handier than the extra magnification of 12 vs 9 at 300 yards ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS. Exactly.
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,177 Likes: 20
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,177 Likes: 20 |
4-12 generally requires parallax adjustment for the best accuracy, 3-9x (or even 3-10x) does not.
In general I prefer 3-9x or 3-10x, unless extra magnification is absolutely required. An extra 2-3x doesn't buy much.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,228
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,228 |
Is there really any significant gain one over the other between a equal quality 3-9 vs 4-12 scopes on a deer hunting rifle used from close to 300 yards?
At 300 yards, a target magnified 9x appears to be 33.3 yards, 100', away. At 300 yards, a target magnified 12x appears to be 25 yards, 75', away. Not much difference. A wider field of view at the lowest power setting might prove to be more valuable/useful than the difference in magnification at 300 yards.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,682
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,682 |
Good morning, On closer shots the wider FOV of a 3x vs a 4x will come in handier than the extra magnification of 12 vs 9 at 300 yards ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS. Exactly. Ditto
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662 |
Have been using a Z3 3.5-10x42 brh scopes on several guns but decided it I wanted a little more.
Just picked up a used Z3 4-12x50 and am liking it a lot!
Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,441
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,441 |
Is there really any significant gain one over the other between a equal quality 3-9 vs 4-12 scopes on a deer hunting rifle used from close to 300 yards?
At 300 yards, a target magnified 9x appears to be 33.3 yards, 100', away. At 300 yards, a target magnified 12x appears to be 25 yards, 75', away. Not much difference. A wider field of view at the lowest power setting might prove to be more valuable/useful than the difference in magnification at 300 yards. That certainly is a practical bit of information. It does not appear to be a major difference (gain) going to the 12x.
Liberalism is a cancer Support Christian Family values
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 772
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 772 |
With current technology, I'm pretty much convinced that at 1.5-8x scope is the perfect combination of price, weight, and magnification for a big game optic. I wish more manufacturers would include this option in their 5x zoom lineups. I've never had an issue with 3 - 3.5x on the bottom end but the fov at 1.5x is really nice. 8x is plenty at the top.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,291 Likes: 2
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,291 Likes: 2 |
I prefer the 3-9 over the 4-12 (and 3.5-10 over the 4.5-14) for all the reasons mentioned. In fact, Leupold’s 4-12x40 is near the top of my least favorite scope list, while the 3-9 and 3.5-10x40 are among my very favorite.
“Perfection is Achieved Not When There Is Nothing More to Add, But When There Is Nothing Left to Take Away” Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,228
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,228 |
Over the past 40 years I've shifted away from most 3-9x scopes and toward 2-7x scopes, particularly on short action bolt guns, or 4-12x/4-16x scopes on rifles that will only be used in open country or where they won't be used for still hunting or spot and stalk where close range shots are more likely to present themselves. Most 2-7x scopes have pretty short tubes which can make them a challenge to fit on some long action bolt guns. My elk rifles are a Remington 760 with a 2-7x for hunting the black timber and a CLR with a 3-9x scope for hunting the more open country and the more open aspen groves.
One 3-9x40 that I'll miss is the Leupold 3-9x40 Shotgun scope, due to its very useful heavy duplex reticle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,179
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,179 |
I prefer the 3-9 over the 4-12 (and 3.5-10 over the 4.5-14) for all the reasons mentioned. In fact, Leupold’s 4-12x40 is near the top of my least favorite scope list, while the 3-9 and 3.5-10x40 are among my very favorite. Yep, if you'll look, Leupold's 4-12 have much narrower fields of view compared to other manfs. scopes of the same power. VX-Freedom 4-12 at 4x = 21.5' @ 100 yds Swaro 4-12x50 at 4x = 29.1' @ 100 yds Vortex Diamondback 4-12 at 4x = 32.4' @ 100 yds
Some people are educated beyond their intelligence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,587 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,587 Likes: 1 |
I like a 4x16x40 or 2.5x16x 42. I use bushnell 4200 ,elites,4500,6500 on all my deer rifles. I like 16x more for watching deer at longer yardages especially in the woods. if they are within range I want to be able to really a buck to figure out antler size. I have stopped carrying bino's after moving up in power. my old eyes need help.i have never seen the need for a objective bigger than 42mm with good glass.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,882 Likes: 10
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,882 Likes: 10 |
Is there really any significant gain one over the other between a equal quality 3-9 vs 4-12 scopes on a deer hunting rifle used from close to 300 yards?
Unless you simply "gotta have" more magnification I'd say go with the 3-9.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,177 Likes: 20
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,177 Likes: 20 |
magshooter1,
The Leupold's FOV is smaller because the eye relief is much longer. FOV vs. eye relief is always an optical trade-off, everything else being equal, and Leupold has always opted for longer eye relief.
Here are the listed eye relief numbers for the scopes you mentioned: Vortex 3.3-3.5 inches Swarovski 3.54 Leupold 4.9 (4x) - 3.74 (12x)
Generally, even in so-called "constant eye relief" scopes, eye relief is longer at lower powers. In "constant eye relief scopes" it usually varies by about half an inch.
Consequently, when scope manufacturers list only one eye relief for a variable scope, it's usually the eye relief on the lowest magnification. Don't have that specific Vortex on hand, but do have a Swarovski. Eye relief in 4x does measure just about 3.5 inches, but at 12x is slightly less than 3 inches. Please note that the Leupold's eye relief is LONGER at 12x than the Swarovski's is at any power.
This is not a "fault" of Leupold scopes, it's how they've always chosen to deal with the eye-relief/FOV compromise. Many shooters prefer more eye relief than 3 to 3.5 inches.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,556 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,556 Likes: 12 |
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want. Rehabilitation is way overrated. Orwell wasn't wrong. GOA member disappointed NRA member 24HCF SEARCH
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,207
Posts18,503,876
Members73,994
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|