|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,185
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,185 |
I read a comment a few weeks ago of someone using this powder in a .308 Win. I can't find reloading data for it in that caliber. Has anyone loaded for the .308 with this powder and have a source for loading info?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488 |
The reason there is no load data is because it is really not an appropriate propellant for the .308, it is too fast. Sure, you can use almost any powder and it will go bang - Red Dot is commonly used successfully for reduced loads in the .308 and similar cartridges - but it won’t likely be recommended by the powder makers or have pressure tested data for it. AA1680 is usually placed between AA5744 and CFE BLK in burn rate.
.
Last edited by DoubleRadius; 04/21/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,981
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,981 |
I've used 1680 in .22 Hornet, 7.62x39, and .32-20; all tiny cartridges. I couldn't imagine it being suitable for .308 except possibly in a reduced load, and only then if the data was from a reputable source like a powder company or a bullet manufacturer. Still, there are probably better powders for reduced .308 loads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,990
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,990 |
I wouldnt even try in a 308 way to fast.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 898 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 898 Likes: 1 |
I use AA1680 in my straight wall 357 Rimless. .223 basic brass trimmed to 1.95 with a 180 gr 358 bullet running 2600 FPS. Legal in Michigan. It’s a hammer with out the recoil.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,185
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,185 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,185
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,185 |
I've used 1680 in .22 Hornet, 7.62x39, and .32-20; all tiny cartridges. I couldn't imagine it being suitable for .308 except possibly in a reduced load, and only then if the data was from a reputable source like a powder company or a bullet manufacturer. Still, there are probably better powders for reduced .308 loads. How did it work in the 32-20?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,981
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,981 |
I've used 1680 in .22 Hornet, 7.62x39, and .32-20; all tiny cartridges. I couldn't imagine it being suitable for .308 except possibly in a reduced load, and only then if the data was from a reputable source like a powder company or a bullet manufacturer. Still, there are probably better powders for reduced .308 loads. How did it work in the 32-20? I was trying some new loads just last week. I don't have my notes handy, but I recall good results as far as accuracy with 1680. However, IMR4227 was a bit better. I normally use Unique in the .32-20 with 115-120 grain bullets cast from a Lyman mould. 1680 loads probably equaled the Unique loads for accuracy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,079 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,079 Likes: 4 |
As previously mentioned 1680 is to fast for optimum performance in the .308.
I wouldn't put it in the "dangerous" category. Maximum pressures are reached at around 85% case capacity and you can expect to give up around 200 FPS when compared against more optimum .308 powders.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 488 |
How did it work in the 32-20? It worked well in my .32-20 Contender rifle....but in an unconventional use. Under 220-grain SPRN bullets it gave good accuracy. However, H110 gave similar performance. Velocity wasn’t a concern as I was keeping all loads subsonic. For more convention .32-20 bullet weights, I suspect iAA1680 is too slow based on my testing in a .30 Carbine Contender. Even 130-grain bullets left a lot of soot in the barrel. .
Last edited by DoubleRadius; 04/22/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 145
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 145 |
I use 1680 in .45-70 and it works good. I shoot 350 gr bullets or less. I have used 250 gr Barnes over 1680 and pushed it at 2400 FPS. It was accurate and very deadly on the deer and Black bear. I have not worked anything else up as I still have a good supply. Have a great day. Jim
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,924 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,924 Likes: 1 |
Maybe as a reduced load in the 308, but nothing more. As was said above, there are better powders for reduced 308 loads.
There are 2 rules to success:
1. Never tell everything that you know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,930
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,930 |
It's my favorite powder in the .357 Maximum with 180 gr. and heavier bullets. I wouldn't use it in a .308 Win
Selmer "Daddy, can you sometime maybe please go shoot a water buffalo so we can have that for supper? Please? And can I come along? Does it taste like deer?" - my 3-year old daughter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 193
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 193 |
Originally designed for the 7.62X39mm, where it excels giving, I think, the highest velocities w/ the 124gr. bullet over any other powder. Not at all ideal in the 308Win. -Mark
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,735
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,735 |
I also was thinking of trying 1680 powder in the 45-70. I haven’t see any data with it for the 45-70, is there any somewhere?
|
|
|
|
510 members (12savage, 1badf350, 2500HD, 1minute, 1beaver_shooter, 219DW, 42 invisible),
2,479
guests, and
1,247
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,292
Posts18,505,267
Members73,998
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|