24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,074
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,074
I've been shooting 260 Rem. & the Barnes 120gr X & now the 120gr TSX. We take elk every season with complete pass thru. Heavy bone or muscle does not stop them. They tend to retain 100% of their weight which means penetration. A hunting buddy & his son use 270"s & the 130gr TSX. Same thing complete pass thru on elk. Never seen the 110's used on elk but I have seen them pass thru the heaviest muley bucks like a hot knife thru butter. A big plus is that they don't shatter & splinter like C&C bullets. If you inadvertently strike a meaty spot like a shoulder you won't blow it up like a C&C bullet. Used the Nosler partition for years but these mono's far out penetrate the Nosler. When it comes to heavy game like elk the mono's are the only bullet I want. Many years back before the 260 Rem came out I built my wife a 6.5x08 ( 260 Rem now ) wild cat. First elk she shot was at a lasered 197yds. Shooting the then Barnes 120gr "X" the bull dropped at the shot with complete penetration thru both front shoulders. These bullets are amazing.. When loading always start at .050 off the lands as Barnes recommends. Some where between .030 & .070 off the lands you will find your rifles accuracy sweet spot.

GB1

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792

Say, Gunner that load shows 70,000+psi in Quickload.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,267
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,267
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by GunTruck50

Say, Gunner that load shows 70,000+psi in Quickload.


Knew it was a hot load, but, as said, no load data available at the time, caseheads miked okay and primer pockets remained snug, is the 270 a sammi speced 65K cartridge, or is that the '06 or 308 Winchester?


Trump Won!
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
you can get about 3470fp at about 60K with RL26 according to Qiuckload. I was using RL16 and RL17 with same bullet at 3400fps.

Last edited by GunTruck50; 02/25/18.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,267
Likes: 2
G
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
G
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,267
Likes: 2
10-4, I finally broke the rifle down for a custom build, my other 270's are pre-64's, a FWT and a Standard rifle, I shoot 150 and 160 gr Partitions in them with RL-22, 150's run an easy 2925, the 160's go 2800 in the 22" barreled Feather Weight.


Trump Won!
IC B2

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 985
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 985
The 110's are pretty impressive on deer. Accurate and light recoiling.

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792

I,m going to load more Barnes TTSX 110gr in my 270. Might have a chance to shoot some coyotes in Canada next fall, maybe even a wolf.
That seems to be a smoking bullet. My old arms like the recoil. about like shooting my 257 Roberts.

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,396
U
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
U
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,396
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by uncle joe
I've loaded 56.5 gr of RL17 for and accurate round but haven't chrono'd . what load got you to 3550?


It's raining to beat 60 out there right now Uncle Joe, I'll run out to the shop and grab my load afterwhile and get you the powder charge, I do remember conversing with another 'Fire member who PM'd me that he had done the same thing with his 270 and the 110 gr TTSX.


Uncle Joe, I worked up this load in my rifle in 2011 before any load data was available, 60.5 grs RL-17 sent the 110 gr TTSX to 3552 fps in my rifle, W-W brass, fed 215 primers and a COL of 3.250"

Accuracy was .660" for three at 100.


I'll have to work up a few . Appreciate the response.


Never try to teach a pig to sing...
...it wastes your time and annoys the pig!
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,792

Joe, I loaded that same load, 56.5gr of RL16 and RL17 110gr Barnes TTSX CCI 200 primer. Got 3401 with one and 3400 with the other.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,936
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,936
I have used the 110 TSX out of one 270. This was probably 10 plus years ago. The load was running 3250fps, and do not have load details at hand. Used on many deer, a couple antelope, blackbuck, Axis, and hogs. No elk.

They simply worked. I did recover two, that retained 100% weight and perfect expansion. Both were second shots from the south end of north bound deer, both were found in the neck area after two plus feet of penetration.

I am going to work up a load for my son's 270 this year with 110gr TTSX,


Arcus Venator
IC B3

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494
R
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
R
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,494
Originally Posted by GunTruck50

Say, Gunner that load shows 70,000+psi in Quickload.

As far off as quick load can be in predicting speeds I'm not sure I'd trust the pressures to be that reliable either. But I could be wrong.

Loaded a few boxes of 95s in 270 win for friends dad. Really worked well on smaller hill country deer. Quick death, short runs generally. Even with less than ideal hits. Not so bad on meat damage like CC bullets can do.

Never recovered a bullet.


We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,668
O
Campfire Regular
Online Content
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,668
I've known a number of shooters who found that Quick load can be way off as to "maximum pressures." when one considers the wide variety of barrels, components and weather in which we shoot, it's not wonder. E

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,293
Likes: 6
A
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,293
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by JayJunem
Like the title says, I'm wondering if people are using the lighter Barnes TTSX bullets in the .270 Winchester. What kind of results are you seeing on game? Has anybody used the 110 gr. on bigger game like elk? Never hear much about 'em. Or maybe I just haven't been paying attention.


Wife of a friend of mine uses that combo on elk, and I don't think he's even loading it to max for her. He said she's killed 4 cows with it so far.


Casey

Not being married to any particular political party sure makes it a lot easier to look at the world more objectively...
Having said that, MAGA.
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,396
U
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
U
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,396
The
Originally Posted by uncle joe
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by uncle joe
I've loaded 56.5 gr of RL17 for and accurate round but haven't chrono'd . what load got you to 3550?


It's raining to beat 60 out there right now Uncle Joe, I'll run out to the shop and grab my load afterwhile and get you the powder charge, I do remember conversing with another 'Fire member who PM'd me that he had done the same thing with his 270 and the 110 gr TTSX.


Uncle Joe, I worked up this load in my rifle in 2011 before any load data was available, 60.5 grs RL-17 sent the 110 gr TTSX to 3552 fps in my rifle, W-W brass, fed 215 primers and a COL of 3.250"

Accuracy was .660" for three at 100.


I'll have to work up a few . Appreciate the response.

Originally Posted by uncle joe
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by uncle joe
I've loaded 56.5 gr of RL17 for and accurate round but haven't chrono'd . what load got you to 3550?


It's raining to beat 60 out there right now Uncle Joe, I'll run out to the shop and grab my load afterwhile and get you the powder charge, I do remember conversing with another 'Fire member who PM'd me that he had done the same thing with his 270 and the 110 gr TTSX.


Uncle Joe, I worked up this load in my rifle in 2011 before any load data was available, 60.5 grs RL-17 sent the 110 gr TTSX to 3552 fps in my rifle, W-W brass, fed 215 primers and a COL of 3.250"

Accuracy was .660" for three at 100.


I'll have to work up a few . Appreciate the response.

Originally Posted by uncle joe
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by uncle joe
I've loaded 56.5 gr of RL17 for and accurate round but haven't chrono'd . what load got you to 3550?


It's raining to beat 60 out there right now Uncle Joe, I'll run out to the shop and grab my load afterwhile and get you the powder charge, I do remember conversing with another 'Fire member who PM'd me that he had done the same thing with his 270 and the 110 gr TTSX.


Uncle Joe, I worked up this load in my rifle in 2011 before any load data was available, 60.5 grs RL-17 sent the 110 gr TTSX to 3552 fps in my rifle, W-W brass, fed 215 primers and a COL of 3.250"

Accuracy was .660" for three at 100.


I'll have to work up a few . Appreciate the response.

Originally Posted by uncle joe
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by uncle joe
I've loaded 56.5 gr of RL17 for and accurate round but haven't chrono'd . what load got you to 3550?


It's raining to beat 60 out there right now Uncle Joe, I'll run out to the shop and grab my load afterwhile and get you the powder charge, I do remember conversing with another 'Fire member who PM'd me that he had done the same thing with his 270 and the 110 gr TTSX.


Uncle Joe, I worked up this load in my rifle in 2011 before any load data was available, 60.5 grs RL-17 sent the 110 gr TTSX to 3552 fps in my rifle, W-W brass, fed 215 primers and a COL of 3.250"

Accuracy was .660" for three at 100.


I'll have to work up a few . Appreciate the response.


Loaded several and tried them yesterday. First shot was 4” high (was shooting 150 Hornady’s) Adjusted scope and got a .75” group a half inch high at 100 yards. Not bad. Now comes the problem, I decided to try some 130 gr ttsx factory ammo while there and the group dropped .75” with all 3 touching. Kind of hard to justify reloading unless it’s just to pass time.
I’m guessing the 130’s will do about anything I want to do.


Never try to teach a pig to sing...
...it wastes your time and annoys the pig!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

451 members (1OntarioJim, 1234, 10gaugeman, 1Longbow, 1lessdog, 1minute, 44 invisible), 2,100 guests, and 1,231 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,262
Posts18,504,854
Members73,998
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.102s Queries: 44 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8813 MB (Peak: 0.9688 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-11 18:23:12 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS