|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315 |
Don't see much on here about the Sauer 100. On par with Tikka? Better, worse, same? Thought about tripping on out to EuroOptic and maybe trying one.
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,517 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,517 Likes: 1 |
I have a bud that owns one. It's very accurate with factory ammo. He seems well satisfied. Ymmv.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315 |
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468 |
I have basically both rifles, My Sauer is a 101 however in 7x64 and I have had a couple of T3's and my son still has a Tikka T3. Both are very accurate, great triggers, and smooth actions. My Sauer has a wood stock as it is the Lux model. I prefer the Sauer, but I don't think you can go wrong with either rifle. Neither of them required anything but mounting a scope. I like the safety setup on the Sauer a bit more.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315 |
What do you like better about the safety?
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,468 |
The fact that it is inline with the bolt and very positive on and off. The Tikka is OK, but is on the side.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,632
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,632 |
The Tikka 10 times out of 10!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 741
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 741 |
I've got both a Tikka T3x SS in .300 Win and a Sauer 100 XT in 6.5 CM, both purchased last fall. The Sauer, IMO, is every bit the equal of the Tikka in terms of accuracy, fit and finish. Accuracy wise, both are sub-MOA shooters with both my handloads and factory loads, the 6.5 CM probably a bit more accurate with factory loads just because of its chambering. The Sauer feels like it has a higher grade polymer stock and I really like how it feels, however, it has a LOP of 14 9/16" which I find just too long even though I am 6' 1" and the Tikka just fits me better. Also, while both come with a pretty hard recoil pad, it is easy to switch out the Tikka's for a Simms Limbsaver, which I have really appreciated on the .300 Win. I don't think Simms makes one for the Sauer and I'm glad it's in 6.5 CM.
Both have outstanding triggers that are easily adjusted without taking the action out of the stock. I have both set at 2 3/4" pounds and they break like glass, but I like the feel of the Sauer just a bit more. The Sauer also has a flush fitting 5-round magazine, whereas the Tikka is a 3 round magazine even in non-magnum cartridges. The Sauer is about 1/2 lb. heavier than the Tikka, some of that weight I attribute to the longer stock and the fact that it has a metal trigger guard rather than polymer like the Tikka. The Sauer is finished in a semi-glossy blue, whereas from what I recall of the Tikkas, they are a matte blue, which I would prefer if I did not have the stainless version.
Regarding the safeties of each, the Tikka has a 2-position and the Sauer has a 3-position. Since the Tikka locks the bolt in the "Safe" position, I really don't have a preference, I guess if pressed I'd choose the Sauer's 3-position. The actions on both are super smooth, with the Tikka's bolt being slimmer. The Sauer rifle is backed by a 10 year, sub-MOA for 5-shots warranty and I don't recall what Tikka's warranty is.
All in all, I've been extremely pleased with both rifles and they both are my best shooting rifles of the several high-power ones I own. A guy could not go wrong with either rifle, but if I could only keep one, I'd choose the Tikka because it's 1/2 lb. lighter, stainless steel, has a better recoil pad and has a LOP that makes it quicker to shoulder.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315 |
Yeah,that length of pull could be a deal breaker. Ill just have to see how it feels. Maybe they are some big dudes over there. Mote so than Finland.
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,610 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,610 Likes: 2 |
I've got both a Tikka T3x SS in .300 Win and a Sauer 100 XT in 6.5 CM, both purchased last fall. The Sauer, IMO, is every bit the equal of the Tikka in terms of accuracy, fit and finish. Accuracy wise, both are sub-MOA shooters with both my handloads and factory loads, the 6.5 CM probably a bit more accurate with factory loads just because of its chambering. The Sauer feels like it has a higher grade polymer stock and I really like how it feels, however, it has a LOP of 14 9/16" which I find just too long even though I am 6' 1" and the Tikka just fits me better. Also, while both come with a pretty hard recoil pad, it is easy to switch out the Tikka's for a Simms Limbsaver, which I have really appreciated on the .300 Win. I don't think Simms makes one for the Sauer and I'm glad it's in 6.5 CM.
Both have outstanding triggers that are easily adjusted without taking the action out of the stock. I have both set at 2 3/4" pounds and they break like glass, but I like the feel of the Sauer just a bit more. The Sauer also has a flush fitting 5-round magazine, whereas the Tikka is a 3 round magazine even in non-magnum cartridges. The Sauer is about 1/2 lb. heavier than the Tikka, some of that weight I attribute to the longer stock and the fact that it has a metal trigger guard rather than polymer like the Tikka. The Sauer is finished in a semi-glossy blue, whereas from what I recall of the Tikkas, they are a matte blue, which I would prefer if I did not have the stainless version.
Regarding the safeties of each, the Tikka has a 2-position and the Sauer has a 3-position. Since the Tikka locks the bolt in the "Safe" position, I really don't have a preference, I guess if pressed I'd choose the Sauer's 3-position. The actions on both are super smooth, with the Tikka's bolt being slimmer. The Sauer rifle is backed by a 10 year, sub-MOA for 5-shots warranty and I don't recall what Tikka's warranty is.
All in all, I've been extremely pleased with both rifles and they both are my best shooting rifles of the several high-power ones I own. A guy could not go wrong with either rifle, but if I could only keep one, I'd choose the Tikka because it's 1/2 lb. lighter, stainless steel, has a better recoil pad and has a LOP that makes it quicker to shoulder.
I own both as well, and this statement above is spot on. I have 223 and 06 in tikka, the sauer is in 9.3. To find a soft recoil pad for the sauer was a M Fer. That tells me as of now, Tikka has much more after market parts. The synthetic stock on the sauer is VERY nice, but honestly I have not felt new T3X. Even thought the action might be a hair slicker on tikka, the sauer feels like its gliding on rails and feels stouter. I don't think you can go wrong with either one.
Last edited by Dre; 08/31/18.
All of them do something better than the 30-06, but none of them do everything as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 822
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 822 |
I’m glad to read these reviews. If they ever bring out the Sauer in Stainless, I’ll pick one up.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315 |
Stainless would be sweet.
"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,517 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,517 Likes: 1 |
My buds is a 308win I believe
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,948 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,948 Likes: 2 |
There are several flavors of the Sauer 100 that are now available through distributors. Some are cerakoted, others are stainless, IIRC.
There are 2 rules to success:
1. Never tell everything that you know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,610 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,610 Likes: 2 |
I didn’t know they had stainless. I would have got that . Damn it
All of them do something better than the 30-06, but none of them do everything as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,610 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,610 Likes: 2 |
Wasn’t available when I bought mine. Wood or synthetic. 2 options is all I had.
All of them do something better than the 30-06, but none of them do everything as well.
|
|
|
|
524 members (10gaugeman, 117LBS, 1234, 12344mag, 1beaver_shooter, 06hunter59, 52 invisible),
2,719
guests, and
1,262
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,792
Posts18,536,373
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|