|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,224 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,224 Likes: 1 |
I ran across a guy at a gunshow that has 3 of these, New Old Stock -- Old MidwayUSA page for NikonFrom as near as I can tell from my google searches, the scopes were discontinued about 8-10 years ago. He wants $500/per scope. Does anyone have experience with these Nikons? From what I'm reading, they have very good glass. I'm more interested in the function/durability. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks.
Give me land, lots of land, under starry skies above. Don't fence me in.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,399 Likes: 10
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,399 Likes: 10 |
I've never met a Nikon I liked. Several I know of have failed, most of them in fact.
Not for me.
_______________________________________________________ An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
LOL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3 |
The Monarch Gold series featured perhaps the best scopes Nikon ever built. They are extremely well-made and both rugged and reliable, not to mention superb for low-light applications, which is what they were designed expressly for. In fact, they offered these with a nice #4 reticle as an option. An acquaintance of mine has the 2.5-10x50/#4 and has used it for moonlight leopard in Africa -- and said it worked perfectly for his applications. I don't doubt that as I have taken hogs in moonlight with one as well. I've used and abused Nikon scopes for many years and never had an issue, though I do not care for the cheaper package scopes that came on certain new rifles and wasn't enamored with the original ProStaff series, either.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,254 Likes: 1 |
I worked with a friend's rifle a couple of years ago and it wore the same scope the OP is asking about. I thought it was rather good, and figured it was probably somewhere in the $600 range when new. Seemed solid and offered a great picture. It was obviously no Prostaff or Buckmaster.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3 |
I have tons more "Nikon" photos but they are being held hostage on photobucket right now LOL.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531 |
I have 4 Nikons, one of which is a Prostaff, and BTW, in that price range that Prostaff surprized me at its clarity. I never owned a Monarch but if they're that much better than the old Buck Masters and Prostaff's then in my opinion they're a first rate scope. I have three of those Buck Masters, the ones before the current Wally World Cheapies that are excellent for a $300 Scope. They competed against the Leupold VX-2s and were very similar in light transmission quality. At present time, along with that old 3-9x40 Prostaff, I have a 4.5-14x40 Buck Master and two 6-18x40 Buck Masters and one Leupold VX-2 and all three have parallax adjustment and I can't tell much difference in those 5 scopes. If I run into a deal on a good used Monarch in a power range of 3-9 or 4-12 I will probably jump on it.
Last edited by Filaman; 10/13/20.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,814
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,814 |
I have had one on a 700KS 7mm STW for many years. Very tough, solid, excellent glass. That $500 tag might be a bit high but they were upper levels scopes and did sell for around $600 new I think. If the price suits, I don't think you will disappointed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,387 Likes: 45
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,387 Likes: 45 |
The Monarch Gold series featured perhaps the best scopes Nikon ever built. They are extremely well-made and both rugged and reliable, not to mention superb for low-light applications, which is what they were designed expressly for. In fact, they offered these with a nice #4 reticle as an option. An acquaintance of mine has the 2.5-10x50/#4 and has used it for moonlight leopard in Africa -- and said it worked perfectly for his applications. I don't doubt that as I have taken hogs in moonlight with one as well. I've used and abused Nikon scopes for many years and never had an issue, though I do not care for the cheaper package scopes that came on certain new rifles and wasn't enamored with the original ProStaff series, either. Exactly. One thing id mention is Nikon will no longer warrant their scopes, since they are no longer in business. This has a direct impact on the value of their optics. Id venture to say the scope is only worth 1/2 what it would have if they were still in business.
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531 |
Are you sure Nikon will no longer warrant their scopes? Because they ARE still in business. They still make excellent camaras.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,928 Likes: 18
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,928 Likes: 18 |
The old Buckmasters and Pro Staffs were turds next to the Monarch Gold. The Monarch Gold scopes also had very generous eye relief.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,309 Likes: 21
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,309 Likes: 21 |
Are you sure Nikon will no longer warrant their scopes? Because they ARE still in business. They still make excellent camaras. It's a fact. I wouldn't touch one with a 10 ft pole.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,421 Likes: 3 |
Are you sure Nikon will no longer warrant their scopes? It's a fact. WRONG. Nikon will indeed honor the warranty on its riflescopes. In fact, here is one link with info -- but there are plenty more articles out there. You can also contact Nikon on your own to verify, just as I did when the rumors began to swirl. Nikon STILL honors warranties
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,309 Likes: 21
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,309 Likes: 21 |
Are you sure Nikon will no longer warrant their scopes? It's a fact. WRONG. Nikon will indeed honor the warranty on its riflescopes. In fact, here is one link with info -- but there are plenty more articles out there. You can also contact Nikon on your own to verify, just as I did when the rumors began to swirl. Nikon STILL honors warrantiesBS......my long time hunting buddy had two of them that his son and daughter were using. They developed problems with holding zerio and reticle adjustment (big surprise), and Nikon sent them a coupon/voucher for $200 off another Nikon product. Big freaking deal. Nikon is a joke and always has been.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,196
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,196 |
I have a Monarch X Tactical 2.5-10X44 that I bought in 2005 for about $1000. The Monarch Gold was the follow-on model I believe, and it was about the same price. Those are excellent scopes and mine has seen a lot of shooting (competition) and hunting (when I used to do that.) It's never had a problem and I still have it. It is built solid and the glass is nice.
I have another Monarch that's a little older, a 6.5-20X44, which is extremely nice also. The Monarch line was top notch, just not top tier.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,867 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,867 Likes: 2 |
Nikon quit making scooes for a reason. Most guys that have had them have figured out why.
Just because you're offended doesn't mean your right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,400 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,400 Likes: 1 |
I could wrong, but I seem to recall the monarch gold line production never left Japan......and the product line was considered nikon's best and prices reflected that....$1500-$1900ish.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,400 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,400 Likes: 1 |
I've purchased 2 monarch 3 level nikon's in the past year for around $225 each, both originally priced at $400 before closeout. Both are solid clear optics and I wasnt worried about warranty as I had been using the monarch scopes on 2 other rifles with no issues since buying over 12 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 672
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 672 |
No way I'd give that much for one. Optics are advancing so fast these days, it makes what was special about that line, common place now. Wait til Doug does another run of Meoptas on special. You'll be better off in the end and if Meoptas (or what ever line he gets a deal on) doesn't stand behind its product, Doug will.
|
|
|
|
468 members (1beaver_shooter, 12344mag, 1badf350, 10gaugemag, 160user, 06hunter59, 39 invisible),
2,687
guests, and
1,198
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,786
Posts18,536,296
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|