|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648 |
Getting ready to get another scope. Looking at the Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x40 without AO or side focus. Is this a quality scope or is money better spent to at least get the side focus model? All hunting will be big game in the mtns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,881 |
All Leupold VX3's are high quality scopes. The non parallax adjustable 4.5-14X40's were introduced by Leupold because they discovered that most buyers of them were big game, not small varmit, hunters. The advantage to that design is that you'll have a deeper or longer depth of focus than either of the parallax adjustable models. However, anything over 10X is going to show parallax. And this will enlarge your groups. You may be able to use the ocular to remove some of it, but I've never been able to remove quite all of it even in my 4-6X scopes. Frankly, I flat don't care for any of the Leupold 4.5-14X scopes for big game hunting. They have too many optical compromises, and too little eye box at the lower magnifications to make me happy. I much prefer the smaller variables or, better yet, the basic 4X and 6X models. They have plenty of magnification for any big game hunting. E
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,487 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,487 Likes: 1 |
I have the 4.5-14x40LR (30mm tube model) on my mid-weight walking varminter. It has the side focus.
I like the scope for its intended purpose but it isn't as forgiving as some other leupold scopes i have or have had.
that said, i'd happily use it for deer in open country. Don't think it is necessary in a "mountain" rifle but your definition of big game in the mountains may be different from mine
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,131
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,131 |
Having looked thru all the 4.5x14x40's I would not want one without the side focus!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,131
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,131 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,671 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,671 Likes: 6 |
Agree with the others - the only way I'd run that one is with AO or SF.
WWP53D
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
The 3.5-10x40 is their best variable for a hunter. Just my 2c's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,753
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,753 |
The side focus is going to be a 30mm tube, for a rifle intended for the mountains I would go with the AO with a 1" tube before the SF. I have 3 with AO and the eye box is more critical as is always being brought up, but I have never had a problem with them.
Also have one 4.5-14 LR and like it, but don't know if I would go that route again on a strictly big game rifle.
But than again I would probably opt for the 3.5-10 with a CDS and probably live happily ever after.
Life is just one damned thing after another
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,085
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,085 |
Getting ready to get another scope. Looking at the Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x40 without AO or side focus. Is this a quality scope or is money better spent to at least get the side focus model? All hunting will be big game in the mtns. I have and like the 4.5x14. I use it on a rifle I hunt open country, and for that environment it works very well. I have the AO and wouldnt want one without it.
Last edited by KCBighorn; 04/03/11.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,720
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,720 |
I would think any scope over 10X should be AO,I can't use one with MY eyes....
Come on America, Athletes and actors are not heroes, only soldiers, airmen,marines and sailors get that respect�and let's add firemen and LEO's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648 |
Seems like that much power an AO is a better way to go, from what I can gather. I have my eye on a couple of Zeiss in that same power and maybe and I score one of them instead. Thanks for the help! This will be my "big money" purchase so I wanna be sure it's done right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,039
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,039 |
The Conquest is a bunch of scope for the $$$$ !!
In the 4.5-14 config. I like the Conquest a good bit better!!
Last edited by LIV2HUNT; 04/03/11.
"If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score?" Vince Lombardi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,364 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,364 Likes: 1 |
Agree with RDFinn, for my mountain and plains rigs, 3.5-10 is very hard to beat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648 |
Now you all have me thinking. Maybe go with the 3.5-10x44 zeiss or the Leupold 3.5-10x40. About $100.00 difference is it. Decisions decisions.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,946
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,946 |
My dedicated antelope rifle (Model 70 .264) wears a VX-III 4.5x14x40 B&C, non-AO, and I wouldn't change a thing. I don't find the lack of parallax adjustment a handicap, like the focus. It's definitely true the eye box is smaller than lower powered scopes of this line, but I've not found it an issue, especially in long range, fairly deliberate shooting. I don't use this rifle in the timber, however.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,293
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,293 |
Now you all have me thinking. Maybe go with the 3.5-10x44 zeiss or the Leupold 3.5-10x40. About $100.00 difference is it. Decisions decisions..... This is all second hand information, and free to boot, so take it for what it's worth (not much!) but I heard enough... well, bad may be too strong of word, but enough to make me pass on the 3.5-10 Zeiss. (I do have four 3-9x's, a 4.5-14x44, and a 4x, so I do like Zeiss.)
This is a shooting forum, there is no place here for logic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 648 |
Now you all have me thinking. Maybe go with the 3.5-10x44 zeiss or the Leupold 3.5-10x40. About $100.00 difference is it. Decisions decisions..... This is all second hand information, and free to boot, so take it for what it's worth (not much!) but I heard enough... well, bad may be too strong of word, but enough to make me pass on the 3.5-10 Zeiss. (I do have four 3-9x's, a 4.5-14x44, and a 4x, so I do like Zeiss.) KDK So you did not like the 3.5-10 in the zeiss? Just not your preference in a a scope?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 61
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 61 |
I own a Leupold VX-III in the same configuration without AO on a custom Weatherby Vanguard 257 Weatherby Magnum and have no issues whatsoever. Parallax errors will only become apparent to affect hunting big game with 14x magnification even with the maximum offset at distances of far greater than 500 yards. In fact the maximum linear parallax error for that scope at 500 yards is about 3.2 inches and that is if your eye is at maximum offset from the optical axis. Or 0.60 moa at that distance. Personally I find the eye box very comfortable and forgiving and for a flat shooting cartridge like the 257 it is a perfect low profile scope without encumbering it with a 4 or 5 mm or larger objective of an AO or further complicating the scope with a SF. The Swarovski 2.5-15x44 Z6 30mm has no AO or side focus and cost over 2 grand and the Leupold will do everything that scope will do, meaning you can say the optics are better on the Swaro, but the reality is you are not going to shoot more game with it than the Leupold.
Last edited by Dolphin; 04/07/11.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 671
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 671 |
The Swarovski 2.5-15x44 Z6 30mm has no AO or side focus and cost over 2 grand That scope has side focus.
Ted
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 671
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 671 |
The 3.5-10x40 is their best variable for a hunter. Just my 2c's 100% agree... that and the 2.5-8X36.
Ted
|
|
|
|
376 members (06hunter59, 1Longbow, 22kHornet, 2500HD, 160user, 1badf350, 32 invisible),
2,487
guests, and
1,083
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,783
Posts18,536,223
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|